Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76380

in Seymour, TexasPopulation 3,509

39.58/ 100

Ranked #27,032 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,485 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

58.8%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

93.9 days/year

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.57 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

86.1 mi

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

45.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.7 mi

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Seymour, Texas (ZIP 76380), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 16% nationally (27,032nd) and the bottom 21% of Texas (1,485th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled nitrate sits in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled extreme heat settles in the top 1.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 5.1% nationally. Walkability stands in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 7.3% nationally. More positively, pharmacy is in the top 3.9% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and elder services lies in the top 4.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 76351, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.8–36.3
High blood pressure among adults43.0%38.4–47.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
Depression among adults24.3%20.6–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.6–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.1–46.5
Obesity among adults36.1%27.8–44.7
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.0–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.1–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.1–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.4–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.2–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%60.8–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.7%51.9–59.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.7%62.9–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.9–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.1%26.2–36.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%29.4–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%22.1–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.7–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
Any disability among adults38.5%33.6–43.4
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.4–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.4%17.7–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6430.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription83.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate65.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households59.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+27.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age48.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$45,880$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$103,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$581$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured