ZIP code
73010
in Blanchard, OklahomaPopulation 21,521
50.85/ 100
Ranked #15,074 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)
Ranked #57 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 9.0%)
Ranked #32 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (top 30%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a Superfund site
In this ZIP
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS94thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
62.5 days/year
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST57thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
94.4%
in the top 11.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
17.6%
in the bottom 30% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS30thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
11.0%
in the bottom 27% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS27thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
11.0%
in the bottom 32% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS32ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
3.5%
in the bottom 31% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS31stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Blanchard, Oklahoma (ZIP 73010) comes out in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,074th) and the top 9.0% of Oklahoma (57th).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: fiber broadband resides in the top 11.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers in the top 7.0% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the top 12.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 13.9% nationally, and unemployment is in the top 17% nationally. Modeled fine-particle resides in the top 17% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 73065, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 58%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 53%
11%
Disability
healthier than 55%
7%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 37%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 85%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 89%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 82%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
Disability
healthier than 89%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 81%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 45%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 66%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 69%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 68%
8%
Disability
healthier than 69%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 68%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 58%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 44%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 77.8 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $90,110 predicts 79.7 years — 1.9 years below.
Ranked #2,409 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
73002
Oklahomashares a border
Score 43.44
Closest healthier
73065
Oklahomashares a border
Score 50.99
Similar health profile
75757
Texas97% similar profile
Score 51.78
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 28.0% | 25.6–30.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 38.3% | 35.2–41.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.4% | 7.8–9.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 10.2–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.5% | 6.0–7.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.1% | 6.4–7.8 |
| Depression among adults | 24.8% | 22.1–27.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.0% | 9.8–12.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.6% | 35.4–41.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.8% | 32.9–42.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.3% | 3.0–3.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.0% | 9.4–13.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.6% | 7.5–9.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 76.1% | 73.7–78.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.0% | 75.3–80.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.5% | 85.0–87.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.3% | 60.6–68.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 62.6% | 59.8–65.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.7% | 65.7–77.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.1% | 13.0–17.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.2% | 13.6–17.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 27.1% | 24.0–30.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.1% | 31.6–40.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 17.6% | 15.8–19.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.1% | 15.6–18.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.3% | 12.1–14.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.4% | 14.0–16.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.7% | 31.5–37.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.3% | 7.6–9.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.0% | 7.3–8.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.5% | 13.1–15.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.5% | 3.2–3.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–4.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.6% | 20.8–26.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 11.5–14.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.7–11.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 6.4–7.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.6% | 27.9–35.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 6.7–8.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 8.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 15.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 84.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.3% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 54.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 14.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 39.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $90,110 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $271,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $1,010 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.8 yr ± 0.47 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.47 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured