Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72114

in North Little Rock, ArkansasPopulation 10,093

26.39/ 100

Ranked #31,308 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.4%)

Ranked #550 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 2.2%)

Ranked #59 of 59 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

38.1%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.6%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

25.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

50.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

47%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.9%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 72114, one of several in North Little Rock, Arkansas comes out in the bottom 2.4% nationally (31,308th) and the bottom 2.2% of Arkansas (550th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled tooth loss registers in the top 0.7% nationally, self-care disability stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and vision disability lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability is in the top 1.3% nationally, fair or poor health resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the top 2.0% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 1.6% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 72116, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.9 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $30,175 predicts 75.3 years — 4.4 years below.

    Ranked #5,301 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.9 ± 1.5 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.5 years — 5.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,485 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 70.9 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%28.1–33.4
High blood pressure among adults51.9%48.6–54.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.6–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.9–13.5
Depression among adults23.8%20.9–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.6%18.5–22.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.2–40.5
Obesity among adults50.6%45.7–55.0
Stroke among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years38.1%34.0–42.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%13.4–18.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.4–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.2–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.6–84.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%53.4–62.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.7%35.7–41.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%65.4–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.8–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.5%19.9–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.3%38.2–46.2
Short sleep duration among adults47.0%42.9–51.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.6%33.4–39.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.6%19.3–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%17.2–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.5%21.2–25.9
Any disability among adults46.7%42.9–50.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults16.4%14.8–18.0
Mobility disability among adults26.9%24.4–29.3
Self-care disability among adults9.7%8.8–10.5
Vision disability among adults12.7%11.6–13.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.9%30.6–37.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults39.1%35.8–42.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.3%31.2–37.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.2%26.3–32.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.8–23.0
Loneliness among adults38.3%34.6–42.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults25.4%23.0–27.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate39.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6418.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)14.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)8.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle24.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription71.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate24.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population4.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households39.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$30,175$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$130,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$800$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth70.9 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 70.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured