Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71857

in Prescott, ArkansasPopulation 5,818

29.84/ 100

Ranked #30,801 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.0%)

Ranked #520 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

9.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.88%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

28%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.8%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.4%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Prescott, Arkansas (ZIP 71857) lands in the bottom 4.0% nationally (30,801st) and the bottom 7.5% of Arkansas (520th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk sits in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled tooth loss is in the top 4.4% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 5.1% nationally, short sleep registers in the top 4.9% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 6.3% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 6.4% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 71726, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $53,125 predicts 77.6 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,519 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.2–38.0
High blood pressure among adults50.5%46.3–54.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Depression among adults24.4%21.0–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.1–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%37.4–46.1
Obesity among adults44.9%37.1–52.7
Stroke among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.0%23.9–32.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.6–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%78.0–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.2–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.2%54.9–65.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.2%42.6–50.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%62.7–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%9.8–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.3–23.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.7%35.7–45.9
Short sleep duration among adults43.8%37.1–50.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.4%28.1–34.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%18.0–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%16.9–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.6%18.6–22.8
Any disability among adults45.3%40.8–49.8
Hearing disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.7–14.4
Mobility disability among adults23.9%21.3–26.5
Self-care disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.0%26.2–33.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.9%23.6–30.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.5–23.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.3–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.8–14.9
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.7–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription75.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate68.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$53,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$86,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$906$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured