Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71929

in Bismarck, ArkansasPopulation 4,627

45.29/ 100

Ranked #22,108 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #91 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.93%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.8%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.2%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Bismarck, Arkansas (ZIP 71929) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,108th) and the top 16% of Arkansas (91st).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled mammography is in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 18% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides in the top 20% nationally. On the better side, modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 1.1% nationally, fiber broadband rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover stands in the top 13.4% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 15% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled radon sits in the bottom 22% nationally, and transportation noise is in the bottom 20% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 71933, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 31.9 — 60 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,751 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.3–34.6
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.0–47.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.3–11.0
Depression among adults24.8%21.1–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%37.1–46.3
Obesity among adults35.5%28.4–43.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.6%14.7–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.6–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.6–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.5–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.3–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.7–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.2%50.3–58.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.2%57.2–74.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.7–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.5–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%26.8–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%32.2–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.5%20.4–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
Any disability among adults38.6%33.8–43.7
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.4–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.0–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.5–17.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.1–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.7–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Loneliness among adults33.9%28.9–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription82.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households63.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+21.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age46.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$55,747$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$213,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$816$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured