Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71743

in Gurdon, ArkansasPopulation 2,913

40.18/ 100

Ranked #26,631 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #251 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.77%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.1 ppb

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

43.2%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.7%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Gurdon, Arkansas (ZIP 71743) stands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,631st) and the top 45% of Arkansas (251st).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: lead in tap water resides in the top 3.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 6.5% nationally, and short sleep resides in the top 8.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 7.9% nationally. More positively, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 0.3% nationally, mental-health providers resides in the top 2.1% nationally, and fiber broadband stands in the top 3.9% nationally. Elder services sits in the top 4.7% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 7.5% nationally.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 71726, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.9–36.1
High blood pressure among adults47.7%43.2–52.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%35.8–44.6
Obesity among adults43.4%35.4–51.5
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.3–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%10.1–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.4–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.0–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.3–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%60.2–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.2%51.2–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%68.1–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.4–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.9–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.0%30.7–41.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.4%35.7–49.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%24.2–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.5–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.7–21.0
Any disability among adults40.9%36.0–45.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.4%18.0–23.1
Self-care disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.0%26.1–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.6%18.7–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.0–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Loneliness among adults34.8%29.7–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)11.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription73.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate71.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households65.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$48,253$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$132,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$708$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured