Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71671

in Warren, ArkansasPopulation 8,601

37.11/ 100

Ranked #28,474 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.3%)

Ranked #367 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

21.4 mi

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8.5 ppb

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.8%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.8%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.8%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.9%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Warren, Arkansas (ZIP 71671), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 11.3% nationally (28,474th) and the bottom 35% of Arkansas (367th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 4.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Elder services stands in the top 5.8% nationally. By contrast, lead in tap water lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure is in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 6.6% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 7.3% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 71660, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $43,419 predicts 76.8 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,076 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.5–36.4
High blood pressure among adults48.8%44.6–53.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Depression among adults23.0%19.6–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.4%15.2–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.0–45.8
Obesity among adults42.7%34.8–50.9
Stroke among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.8%20.8–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%12.8–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.0–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.6–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.2–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.0–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.8%44.0–51.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.1–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.9–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.4–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.9%34.8–45.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.8%35.9–49.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.0%27.8–34.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%16.9–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.9–22.2
Any disability among adults44.2%39.5–48.9
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Mobility disability among adults22.8%20.4–25.5
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%26.3–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.4%23.4–29.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.9%16.5–21.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.6–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Loneliness among adults35.0%30.0–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.9%13.1–16.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6418.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)15.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate64.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population6.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age40.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$43,419$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$101,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$704$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured