Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32148

in Interlachen, FloridaPopulation 12,063

37.18/ 100

Ranked #28,440 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.4%)

Ranked #923 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

169.8 days/year

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.0%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.5%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.7%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.5%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Interlachen, Florida (ZIP 32148), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 11.4% nationally (28,440th) and the bottom 5.3% of Florida (923rd).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled humid heat lies in the top 2.2% nationally, coronary heart disease settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 7.6% nationally, stroke rests in the top 6.9% nationally, and uninsured sits in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled independent living disability registers in the top 7.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 9.3% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the top 9.3% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 32134, just across the boundary. Across the board, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $45,420 predicts 77.0 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,678 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 81.7; chronic-disease standing 11.3 — 70 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,048 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.7–37.3
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.4–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.9%9.9–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.6%12.2–15.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.6–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%38.1–46.1
Obesity among adults32.7%26.7–39.0
Stroke among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.9%17.6–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.5%15.0–20.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.4–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.2–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.5–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%60.4–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.3%46.9–53.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%64.8–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.2–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%19.3–25.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.3%29.0–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%33.0–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%26.4–33.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.7–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults19.8%17.7–22.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.9–21.2
Any disability among adults40.5%36.3–45.1
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.8–12.2
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.2
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.7–24.8
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Vision disability among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6419.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)22.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$45,420$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$112,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$778$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured