Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71109

in Shreveport, LouisianaPopulation 17,412

25.04/ 100

Ranked #31,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #479 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 5.8%)

Ranked #34 of 39 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

10.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.0%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.6%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

56.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

26.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

50.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 71109, one of several in Shreveport, Louisiana, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 1.9% nationally (31,469th) and the bottom 5.8% of Louisiana (479th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled self-care disability settles in the top 0.6% nationally, vision disability lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes settles in the top 0.5% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 1.3% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 0.5% nationally, and obesity settles in the top 0.5% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 71107, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Shreveport-Bossier City, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.6 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $32,939 predicts 75.7 years — 4.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,088 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.6 ± 1.0 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.6 years — 4.0 years below them.

    Ranked #3,012 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.1 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 71.6 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #471 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.8%32.4–38.7
High blood pressure among adults56.5%52.6–59.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.9–13.5
Depression among adults24.6%21.3–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.6%21.8–27.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.0–44.4
Obesity among adults50.8%44.8–56.0
Stroke among adults7.6%7.0–8.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.9%25.6–34.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%9.9–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%80.8–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.1%83.5–88.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%60.0–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.0%41.5–48.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.7–85.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.1%9.1–13.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.6%20.7–26.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.4%38.5–47.7
Short sleep duration among adults45.5%40.2–50.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.7%34.2–41.0
Frequent mental distress among adults21.7%19.3–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.7%17.5–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.1%20.6–25.3
Any disability among adults48.9%44.4–52.8
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults16.4%14.7–18.0
Mobility disability among adults28.5%25.7–31.1
Self-care disability among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Vision disability among adults13.0%11.8–14.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.3%33.0–41.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults45.6%41.6–49.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults44.9%41.1–48.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.3%28.8–35.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults21.7%19.5–24.1
Loneliness among adults41.4%36.6–46.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults26.5%23.7–29.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6417.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)17.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)16.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle15.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription77.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate41.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households26.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$32,939$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$93,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$876$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.6 yr ± 0.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.51 years of 71.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured