Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71103

in Shreveport, LouisianaPopulation 6,332

23.26/ 100

Ranked #31,635 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.4%)

Ranked #488 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 4.0%)

Ranked #36 of 39 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.8%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

32.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

41.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

59.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

33.7%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

8.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 71103, one of several in Shreveport, Louisiana, by its composite score, sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally (31,635th) and the bottom 4.0% of Louisiana (488th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled self-care disability resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and stroke is in the top 0.10% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 0.6% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 0.2% nationally, independent living disability settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 0.2% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 1.6% nationally. More encouragingly, physicians resides in the top 0.4% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, physicians runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71104, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Shreveport-Bossier City, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.2 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $27,380 predicts 75.0 years — 5.8 years below.

    Ranked #5,708 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.2 ± 1.8 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.6 years — 6.4 years below them.

    Ranked #3,595 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 69.2 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.8%35.6–41.8
High blood pressure among adults59.9%56.3–63.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults12.0%10.9–13.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.2%12.7–15.7
Depression among adults23.9%20.9–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.4%24.7–30.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%39.5–47.0
Obesity among adults51.1%45.3–56.4
Stroke among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years33.7%29.0–38.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.8–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.7%82.6–86.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.5%83.9–88.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.6–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.1–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.8%38.4–45.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%72.7–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.3%8.4–12.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.1%22.0–28.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.5%41.8–50.9
Short sleep duration among adults45.0%39.8–50.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults41.3%37.5–44.7
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%18.9–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults21.5%19.2–23.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.9%21.4–26.3
Any disability among adults52.1%47.9–56.2
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Independent living disability among adults17.9%16.0–19.6
Mobility disability among adults32.4%29.5–35.2
Self-care disability among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Vision disability among adults14.7%13.4–16.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.7%33.5–41.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults47.6%43.4–51.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults47.1%43.0–51.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.3%29.1–35.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.3%20.2–24.7
Loneliness among adults41.1%36.6–45.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults26.6%23.9–29.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate37.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6410.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)24.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)31.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle29.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription66.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate45.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households40.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+28.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$27,380$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$75,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$824$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth69.2 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 69.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured