ZIP code
71034
in Hall Summit, LouisianaPopulation 222
33.65/ 100
Ranked #29,855 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.9%)
Ranked #378 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Tooth loss
28.5%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
22.4%
in the top 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS5thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.2%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST23rdUS5thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
18.4 mi
in the top 5.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
12.7%
in the top 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST72ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
72.4%
in the bottom 7.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST18thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
38.3%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Hall Summit, Louisiana (ZIP 71034) lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally (29,855th) and the bottom 26% of Louisiana (378th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled tooth loss registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 7.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 7.8% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum, disaster risk is in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and arsenic settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 5.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally.
A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 71016, about 4.7 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 5%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 45%
21%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 42%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 14%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 15%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 32%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
71019
Louisianashares a border
Score 30.40
Closest healthier
71016
Louisianaabout 4.7 mi away
Score 34.59
Similar health profile
72682
Arkansas99% similar profile
Score 43.09
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.3% | 26.6–33.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.0% | 37.4–46.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.4% | 6.6–8.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.5–12.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.5% | 7.4–9.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.5% | 8.8–12.2 |
| Depression among adults | 29.3% | 24.9–33.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.0% | 33.4–42.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.8% | 31.0–48.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 4.2–5.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 28.5% | 23.8–33.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.9% | 7.7–12.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.6% | 74.9–80.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.7% | 75.9–83.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.8% | 80.1–85.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.7% | 58.8–70.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.5% | 48.3–56.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.8% | 68.7–83.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.3% | 14.0–20.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 21.5% | 18.0–25.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 35.3% | 29.5–41.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.0% | 34.4–49.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.1% | 24.1–32.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.3% | 19.6–25.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.5% | 15.1–19.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 22.4% | 19.5–25.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.2% | 37.6–48.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.4% | 8.3–10.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.9–14.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.9% | 16.9–22.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.8% | 5.0–6.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.8% | 6.8–8.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.6% | 25.3–34.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 26.1% | 22.0–30.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.7% | 18.9–26.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.2% | 15.6–21.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.9% | 11.1–15.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 38.3% | 32.9–44.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 11.4–15.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 15.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 17.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 14.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 6.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504 |
| Broadband subscription | 72.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 22.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504 |
| Homeownership rate | 61.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508 |
| Single-parent households | 39.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495 |
| Population 65+ | 14.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508 |
| Median age | 48.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457 |
| Median home value | $93,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452 |
| Median gross rent | $910 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $915 ($606–$1,325) n=389 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.1 yr ± 1.44 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 75.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.44 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured