Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71435

in Grayson, LouisianaPopulation 3,499

38.60/ 100

Ranked #27,668 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.8%)

Ranked #266 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

31.7%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

138.8 days/year

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13.7 mi

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

11.8 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

54.3%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Grayson, Louisiana (ZIP 71435), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 13.8% nationally (27,668th) and the bottom 48% of Louisiana (266th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled radon is in the bottom 8.3% nationally. On the other hand, poverty lies in the top 5.9% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the top 7.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability is in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 10.4% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is in the top 12.2% nationally, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 12.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness registers in the top 13.3% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 71238, about 0.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.0–33.8
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.4–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Depression among adults28.4%24.5–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.7–43.6
Obesity among adults37.0%29.2–45.7
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.0%19.2–27.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%8.0–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.2–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%75.9–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%81.8–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%58.3–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.9%49.1–56.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.2–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%15.8–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.0%18.1–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.5%26.6–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%33.7–47.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%22.4–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.3–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.3–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.0%17.7–22.5
Any disability among adults40.4%35.6–45.4
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.3
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.6%25.7–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.8–25.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.5–21.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%13.9–18.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.7–12.7
Loneliness among adults36.8%31.5–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)7.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle11.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription80.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate71.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households63.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age48.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$52,787$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$122,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$916$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured