Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70770

in Pride, LouisianaPopulation 3,787

53.57/ 100

Ranked #11,276 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #24 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranked #8 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

153.4 days/year

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

49.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.3%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.7 per million

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.23%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.5%

in the bottom 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.2%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, Pride, Louisiana (ZIP 70770) lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,276th) and the top 4.8% of Louisiana (24th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: homeownership lands in the top 7.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled radon is in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 11.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat rests in the top 3.8% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 70818, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%28.0–34.0
High blood pressure among adults39.0%35.5–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.0–8.2
Depression among adults27.1%23.9–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.8–44.0
Obesity among adults29.9%25.7–34.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.7–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.4–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.6–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.6–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.4–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%68.1–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.6–71.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%74.0–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.3–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.1–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.5%17.2–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.4–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.6–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.8–16.8
Any disability among adults31.7%27.8–35.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.4–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.6–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.8–8.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.1–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Loneliness among adults32.2%28.1–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate96.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households59.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+21.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$92,311$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$165,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured