Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71268

in Quitman, LouisianaPopulation 2,437

38.09/ 100

Ranked #27,954 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranked #278 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.98%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

138.2 days/year

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

54.4%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Quitman, Louisiana (ZIP 71268), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 12.9% nationally (27,954th) and the bottom 45% of Louisiana (278th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and grocery settles in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled humid heat lies in the top 7.8% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 9.4% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity is in the top 7.5% nationally, high blood pressure lands in the top 11.4% nationally, and extreme heat stands in the top 12.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability registers in the top 13.2% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71270, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.7; chronic-disease standing 14.9 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #773 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.2–37.8
High blood pressure among adults45.4%40.9–50.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Depression among adults29.0%24.8–33.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.4–18.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%37.3–46.9
Obesity among adults43.5%35.0–52.8
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.2–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%6.9–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.7–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.3–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.0–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.1–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.2%48.8–57.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%69.0–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.4–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%18.0–24.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%29.7–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%32.4–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%24.0–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%18.1–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.0%17.6–22.5
Any disability among adults41.4%36.4–46.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Mobility disability among adults20.6%18.0–23.2
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%23.5–30.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.0%19.1–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.3–22.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.2–17.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Loneliness among adults34.5%29.6–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription80.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households64.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+23.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age47.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$69,018$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$154,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured