Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70712

in Angola, LouisianaPopulation 4,802

38.74/ 100

Ranked #27,570 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranked #261 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #58 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

76.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

16.1%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.5%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

15.7 mi

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

139 days/year

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Angola, Louisiana (ZIP 70712) sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally (27,570th) and the bottom 49% of Louisiana (261st).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled binge drinking resides in the top 1.0% nationally, floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.3% nationally, and homeownership stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 6.6% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden sits at the national minimum, and fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum, and modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 7.4% nationally.

Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 70782, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%21.6–28.6
High blood pressure among adults43.5%38.9–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Current asthma among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%6.9–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%6.8–10.2
Depression among adults22.8%19.1–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.2–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%34.9–44.3
Obesity among adults41.9%33.2–51.1
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%15.4–23.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%9.4–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%69.2–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.0–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%79.2–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.5%50.5–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.4%46.2–54.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.2%61.0–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.5%19.5–27.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.9%20.9–31.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.6%25.9–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.4%32.9–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%22.5–32.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%15.9–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%13.8–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%16.0–23.0
Any disability among adults38.3%32.3–44.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.2–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.0–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.4–6.4
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.4–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.3%27.7–38.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%17.6–27.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.8%12.9–20.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%13.7–20.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–12.9
Loneliness among adults34.6%28.6–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.8–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)33.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate16.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households15.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age48.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$89,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured