Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32040

in Glen St. Mary, FloridaPopulation 8,978

44.62/ 100

Ranked #22,790 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #757 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #52 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (bottom 13.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

163.1 days/year

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31.5%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.5%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

1.3%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

8.1 mi

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

41.8%

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Glen St. Mary, Florida (ZIP 32040), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,790th) and the bottom 22% of Florida (757th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and radon rests in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Grocery resides in the top 15% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 17% nationally. Unemployment lands in the bottom 21% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled humid heat stands in the top 2.6% nationally, floodplain exposure registers in the top 9.3% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 9.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 13.2% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 32063, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $84,095 predicts 79.4 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,129 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.8–31.9
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.5–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Depression among adults20.8%17.8–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.5–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.5–44.4
Obesity among adults36.3%30.1–42.7
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.7–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%11.0–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.2–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%72.6–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.4–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%59.0–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.5%48.0–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%64.9–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.0–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.7–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%33.7–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.7–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.5–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.1–19.4
Any disability among adults35.3%31.0–39.7
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.9–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households53.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age34.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$84,095$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$261,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,189$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured