Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32460

in Sneads, FloridaPopulation 5,472

43.19/ 100

Ranked #24,208 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #797 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.63%

in the bottom 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

22.1 mi

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

151.3 days/year

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

17.6 mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.62%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

36.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

10 mi

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

77.5%

in the bottom 12.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

39.8%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US74th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite measure, Sneads, Florida (ZIP 32460) sits in the bottom 25% nationally (24,208th) and the bottom 18% of Florida (797th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 0.03% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 6.2% nationally. On the other hand, modeled uninsured lies in the top 5.4% nationally, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled nitrate is in the top 7.1% nationally, and floodplain exposure rests in the top 7.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits in the top 11.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 12.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 13.5% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 39845, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.0 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $51,497 predicts 77.5 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,442 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.0–28.6
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.0–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Depression among adults18.5%15.8–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.7–40.2
Obesity among adults39.8%33.8–46.0
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%14.0–19.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.0%16.0–22.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%69.9–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.6–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults81.6%79.1–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.5–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.2%46.7–53.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%67.5–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.0–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.7%17.8–23.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.2–35.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%35.5–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.6%22.4–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.1–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.7–20.2
Any disability among adults36.8%32.7–41.3
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)21.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription77.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate73.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households51.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$51,497$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$116,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$785$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured