Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70524

in Chataignier, LouisianaPopulation 243

26.61/ 100

Ranked #31,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranked #468 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 7.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

40.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

25.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.4%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

30.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

58.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.5%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Chataignier, Louisiana (ZIP 70524), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally (31,290th) and the bottom 7.9% of Louisiana (468th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled tooth loss lies in the top 0.5% nationally, stroke settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 1.1% nationally, mobility disability rests in the top 0.5% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 2.7% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 1.1% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 2.6% nationally.

A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 70535, just across the boundary. Modeled self-care disability lies in the top 1.1% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 1.0%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.6%37.5–45.8
High blood pressure among adults58.1%53.6–62.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.2%12.1–16.3
Depression among adults24.9%21.3–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults25.5%22.4–28.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.8%41.0–50.7
Obesity among adults49.5%41.0–57.9
Stroke among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years40.5%34.8–46.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%8.6–13.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.7%83.3–87.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.1%83.4–88.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.6–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.8%57.0–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.3%39.5–47.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.4–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%9.8–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.7%20.0–27.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.6%37.4–49.7
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%37.7–52.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.5%31.8–41.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.0–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults21.3%18.6–24.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.8%18.1–23.5
Any disability among adults50.2%44.8–55.6
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Independent living disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.1
Mobility disability among adults30.4%26.5–34.2
Self-care disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Vision disability among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.5%27.0–36.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults33.4%28.4–38.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults32.2%27.5–37.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.5%19.3–25.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.1–17.6
Loneliness among adults34.8%29.4–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.7–20.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)22.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)18.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle12.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription68.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate50.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households86.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+6.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age28.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$64,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,300$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 2.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.92 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured