Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71333

in Evergreen, LouisianaPopulation 381

26.59/ 100

Ranked #31,292 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranked #469 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

7.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

22.5%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.2%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Evergreen, Louisiana (ZIP 71333), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally (31,292nd) and the bottom 7.7% of Louisiana (469th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled stroke rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 1.9% nationally, and diabetes lands in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 0.9% nationally, high blood pressure registers in the top 0.9% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 2.6% nationally, vision disability lies in the top 3.5% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 2.6% nationally.

For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71327, just across the boundary. Modeled diabetes rests in the top 1.4% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 53%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.4%37.5–45.8
High blood pressure among adults55.0%50.8–59.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.5%13.7–17.6
Depression among adults27.7%24.0–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.5%19.9–25.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.6%42.0–51.8
Obesity among adults42.8%35.2–52.3
Stroke among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.8%22.3–31.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.4–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.9%82.8–86.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.0%81.1–87.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%64.4–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.6%46.5–54.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%67.3–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.7–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.3%20.3–26.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.6%36.2–47.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%31.9–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.2%31.5–39.6
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.3–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults21.6%19.2–24.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.4%19.9–25.2
Any disability among adults49.0%44.0–54.6
Hearing disability among adults12.7%11.3–14.3
Independent living disability among adults15.1%13.4–17.1
Mobility disability among adults28.9%25.8–32.5
Self-care disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Vision disability among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.1%26.9–35.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.4%25.6–33.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.6%24.1–31.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.5–21.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.3–15.9
Loneliness among adults37.2%31.9–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.4–16.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate36.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)27.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)18.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle9.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription71.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate83.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households50.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+30.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age54.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$23,611$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$162,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$403$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured