Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70373

in Larose, LouisianaPopulation 5,539

36.60/ 100

Ranked #28,711 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranked #321 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #11 of 21 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Obesity

47%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

144.4 days/year

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

94.3%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Larose, Louisiana (ZIP 70373), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 10.5% nationally (28,711th) and the bottom 37% of Louisiana (321st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: grocery settles in the top 1.8% nationally, elder services lands in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled radon rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Fiber broadband settles in the top 11.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 14.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled obesity rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat lands in the top 6.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity settles in the top 14.4% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 70345, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.7 ± 2.5 years. A median household income of $87,143 predicts 79.5 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #3,954 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.3–36.3
High blood pressure among adults43.8%39.6–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
Depression among adults30.3%26.3–34.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.3–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.8–45.3
Obesity among adults47.0%39.9–53.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.8%17.5–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.0–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.4–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.3–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.0–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%56.9–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.2%48.7–55.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%66.4–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.3–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.3%18.2–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.3%30.2–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.7%35.2–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.7%23.2–30.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.9%18.5–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.9%18.4–23.4
Any disability among adults43.5%38.5–48.2
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Mobility disability among adults20.4%17.8–23.1
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.8%26.0–33.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%19.5–26.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.2–20.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.5–18.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Loneliness among adults35.7%31.0–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)25.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription83.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate88.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households42.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$87,143$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$170,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$760$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured