Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70118

in New Orleans, LouisianaPopulation 36,072

51.66/ 100

Ranked #13,886 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #39 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 7.7%)

Ranked #9 of 67 New Orleans-Metairie, LA ZIPs (top 13.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

22.6%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

25.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.6%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

44.8%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.3%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 70118, one of several in New Orleans, Louisiana comes out in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,886th) and the top 7.7% of Louisiana (39th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: walkability sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the top 3.0% nationally, and loneliness resides in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 5.0% nationally. Housing-cost burden sits in the top 5.6% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 70001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New Orleans-Metairie, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.2 ± 1.6 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.2 years — 2.9 years above them.

    Ranked #855 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.3%19.3–23.4
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.8–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Depression among adults30.5%27.2–33.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.3%28.3–34.2
Obesity among adults28.7%24.7–32.8
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.7–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%7.0–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.6%72.5–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.7–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.5–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%67.2–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.2–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.0–87.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.6%19.6–25.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%10.6–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%19.4–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.4–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.8–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.0–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.5–20.3
Any disability among adults32.4%29.0–35.7
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Mobility disability among adults12.4%11.0–13.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.8%24.3–31.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.0%18.4–23.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.9–19.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.6–17.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Loneliness among adults40.6%36.2–44.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.2–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle14.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate48.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population10.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households43.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age31.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$63,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$465,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,333$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured