Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70301

in Thibodaux, LouisianaPopulation 50,095

43.32/ 100

Ranked #24,087 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #150 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #4 of 21 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

153.1 days/year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

46.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

196 units

in the top 12.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

Thibodaux, Louisiana (ZIP 70301) ranks in the bottom 25% nationally (24,087th) and the top 30% of Louisiana (150th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled disaster risk is in the top 1.4% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and obesity is in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 5.3% nationally. More positively, distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water is in the bottom 9.1% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 12.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 70030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.0 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $58,394 predicts 78.0 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,579 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.7–32.4
High blood pressure among adults41.5%37.8–45.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Depression among adults29.2%25.7–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%34.1–41.5
Obesity among adults46.1%39.9–52.1
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%14.0–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.2–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.8–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.1–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%61.0–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.7–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.9–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.6–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.8%27.0–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%35.9–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%20.4–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.2–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.5–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.9–20.6
Any disability among adults38.5%34.6–42.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.1%15.3–19.0
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.5–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.4%25.0–32.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%19.2–23.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.0%16.2–20.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.9–12.2
Loneliness among adults35.6%31.3–40.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)13.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate74.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$58,394$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$217,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,013$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 0.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.44 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured