ZIP code
70354
in Galliano, LouisianaPopulation 3,404
29.96/ 100
Ranked #30,773 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.1%)
Ranked #432 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)
Ranked #16 of 21 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Obesity
49.4%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
23%
in the top 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
13.4%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
70.4%
in the bottom 6.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST16thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
141.9 days/year
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST41stUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.4%
in the top 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.5%
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST70thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
29.5%
in the top 9.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
27%
in the top 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST67thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
23.4%
in the top 9.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›The read
Galliano, Louisiana (ZIP 70354), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally (30,773rd) and the bottom 15.0% of Louisiana (432nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled obesity lies in the top 0.9% nationally, cognitive disability sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 6.4% nationally, modeled humid heat stands in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lands in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 8.5% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 8.7% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 9.7% nationally.
Defined in plain terms, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 70345, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 18%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 1.0%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 1%
8%
Disability
healthier than 5%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 20%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 10%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 86%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 27%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 6%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 43%
16%
Disability
healthier than 42%
7%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 10%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
70345
Louisianashares a border
Score 38.65
Closest healthier
70357
Louisianashares a border
Score 38.67
Similar health profile
70585
Louisiana99% similar profile
Score 36.71
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.8% | 30.4–37.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.7% | 40.6–48.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.2% | 7.3–9.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–12.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.2% | 8.3–10.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.0% | 10.6–13.5 |
| Depression among adults | 32.1% | 28.1–36.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.5% | 14.4–18.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.0% | 36.8–45.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 49.4% | 42.5–55.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.9% | 4.5–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 23.4% | 19.6–27.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.3% | 10.3–14.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.8% | 75.0–80.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.3% | 75.9–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.4% | 81.1–85.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.6% | 54.7–64.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 51.2% | 47.7–54.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.6% | 64.2–78.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.2% | 15.1–21.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 23.8% | 20.7–27.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 38.1% | 33.1–43.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.7% | 36.2–47.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.5% | 26.0–33.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.5% | 20.0–25.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.4% | 17.2–21.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 23.0% | 20.4–25.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 46.5% | 41.7–51.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–11.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.4% | 11.9–15.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.4% | 19.8–25.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.8–7.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.6–9.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.5% | 25.7–33.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 27.0% | 23.7–30.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 23.2% | 20.2–26.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.2% | 15.9–20.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 11.5–14.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.0% | 31.4–41.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 11.5–14.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 19.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 17.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 14.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 8.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 6.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504 |
| Broadband subscription | 70.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504 |
| Homeownership rate | 77.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.6% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504 |
| Foreign-born population | 5.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508 |
| Single-parent households | 51.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495 |
| Population 65+ | 22.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508 |
| Median age | 47.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500 |
| Median household income | $48,462 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457 |
| Median home value | $111,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452 |
| Median gross rent | $877 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $915 ($606–$1,325) n=389 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.9 yr ± 1.67 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 75.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured