Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70127

in New Orleans, LouisianaPopulation 23,107

40.29/ 100

Ranked #26,550 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #207 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #38 of 67 New Orleans-Metairie, LA ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

59.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

43.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,019 units

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

22.6%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

28.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

52.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 70127, one of several in New Orleans, Louisiana, overall, ranks in the bottom 17% nationally (26,550th) and the top 41% of Louisiana (207th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled loneliness sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 1.5% nationally. PFOA in drinking water lies at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and modeled housing insecurity rests in the top 2.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden registers in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the top 3.1% nationally. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the top 1.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 70128, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New Orleans-Metairie, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.2; chronic-disease standing 25.8 — 56 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,001 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%25.3–30.6
High blood pressure among adults46.7%43.3–50.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Depression among adults25.8%22.8–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.1%17.1–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%31.5–37.9
Obesity among adults40.4%35.5–45.5
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.9%21.1–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.0–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%77.2–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.7–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%65.4–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.7%47.1–54.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.9%78.7–88.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.3–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%16.1–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.0%28.2–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults45.0%40.2–50.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.9%25.0–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.9–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.1–22.4
Any disability among adults39.0%35.2–42.9
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.2–13.9
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.7–22.2
Self-care disability among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.3%33.5–41.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults36.4%32.9–40.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.2%30.8–37.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.4%25.4–31.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.1%16.2–20.0
Loneliness among adults43.5%39.1–47.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.6%20.2–25.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6410.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)17.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)10.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle21.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription75.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)52.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate47.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households33.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$40,765$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$204,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,137$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured