Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70117

in New Orleans, LouisianaPopulation 25,652

39.85/ 100

Ranked #26,856 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #222 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #40 of 67 New Orleans-Metairie, LA ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

52.2%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

230 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

19.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

20.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.2 mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 70117, one of several in New Orleans, Louisiana sits in the bottom 16% nationally (26,856th) and the top 44% of Louisiana (222nd).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 0.9% nationally, PFOA in drinking water sits at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water stands at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled loneliness sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands at the national minimum. Better still, walkability resides in the top 1.7% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 70116, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New Orleans-Metairie, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.6–29.9
High blood pressure among adults42.8%39.5–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.5–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Depression among adults28.2%25.0–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.3–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.8–38.4
Obesity among adults37.6%32.9–42.5
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.0%19.6–26.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.3–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.6–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.7–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%62.7–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.2%49.6–56.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.5%75.8–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.3–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.5–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%26.2–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%36.5–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%23.6–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.5–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.9–21.8
Any disability among adults37.5%34.0–41.2
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.6–20.4
Self-care disability among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Vision disability among adults8.6%8.0–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.0%29.3–36.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%28.0–33.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.2%26.5–32.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.8%21.3–26.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.6%14.0–17.3
Loneliness among adults40.5%36.1–44.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.1%17.1–21.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)9.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle20.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription85.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate52.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households38.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$45,764$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$260,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,269$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured