Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68841

in Giltner, NebraskaPopulation 649

55.83/ 100

Ranked #8,474 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #197 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.4 pCi/L

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Giltner, Nebraska (ZIP 68841) ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,474th) and the top 35% of Nebraska (197th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: civic sits in the top 1.9% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and cognitive disability stands in the bottom 15% nationally. Against that, modeled radon settles in the top 1.1% nationally, binge drinking lies in the top 4.8% nationally, and obesity resides in the top 11.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled extreme heat registers in the top 14.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 68818, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%24.3–30.8
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.1–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.5–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.6–7.8
Depression among adults17.6%14.8–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.0–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.4–39.7
Obesity among adults42.4%35.3–49.6
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%8.8–13.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.1–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.2–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%72.9–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.2%55.5–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%62.0–69.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%68.6–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.0–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%11.8–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%20.7–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%28.8–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.0–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.2–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.5–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.0–13.5
Any disability among adults27.9%23.9–32.4
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.5%10.5–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.7–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.2–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.6–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Loneliness among adults28.4%23.6–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription82.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate87.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households61.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$76,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$221,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$800$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 2.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.10 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured