Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68818

in Aurora, NebraskaPopulation 5,680

58.58/ 100

Ranked #5,924 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #88 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.6 pCi/L

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.53 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.0%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.9%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.26%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Aurora, Nebraska (ZIP 68818) ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,924th) and the top 16% of Nebraska (88th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fiber broadband rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and pharmacy stands in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Dental providers lands in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and elder services is in the top 8.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon settles in the top 0.6% nationally, disaster risk resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and transportation noise registers in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled nitrate rests in the top 7.7% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 68955, about 17 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 14.6; chronic-disease standing 69.1 — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,858 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%24.8–31.1
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.3–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.2–7.3
Depression among adults17.1%14.4–20.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%31.3–39.3
Obesity among adults40.6%33.5–47.9
Stroke among adults3.3%2.8–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%7.9–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.7–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.7–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.0–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.2–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.7–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%64.8–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%70.0–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%16.4–23.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.0–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.0–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%27.1–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.2–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.6
Any disability among adults28.0%24.0–32.1
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.5%10.5–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.8%15.7–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.2–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.8–7.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.9–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.2
Loneliness among adults27.9%23.3–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.3–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–649.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription95.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households54.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$81,045$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$263,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$732$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured