Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

67546

in Inman, KansasPopulation 2,601

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

52.01/ 100

Ranked #13,436 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #203 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

27.5%

in the top 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Inman, Kansas (ZIP 67546) ranks in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,436th) and the top 30% of Kansas (203rd).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Poverty settles in the bottom 14.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 15% nationally, and childcare rests in the top 17% nationally. On the other side, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 10.3% nationally, floodplain exposure lies in the top 11.4% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lands in the top 11.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 12.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

To spell things out, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 67107, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.9–35.6
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.6–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.4
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.0–9.7
Depression among adults20.6%17.6–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.9–44.2
Obesity among adults37.5%31.1–44.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.6–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.9–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%80.0–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.8–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.2–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.2%61.8–68.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.9–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.7–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.2–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%24.0–33.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.6–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.7–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.8–15.6
Any disability among adults33.3%29.0–37.8
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.8–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.7–18.7
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.7–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.9–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.4–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.6
Loneliness among adults29.1%24.7–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–648.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription80.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households66.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+30.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age49.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$76,739$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$192,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$964$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured