Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67144

in Towanda, KansasPopulation 2,712

52.05/ 100

Ranked #13,386 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #202 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #39 of 77 Wichita, KS ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

68.7%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

8.0%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

4.4 mi

in the bottom 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

7.3%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Towanda, Kansas (ZIP 67144) sits in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,386th) and the top 30% of Kansas (202nd).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: civic settles in the top 19% nationally. By contrast, modeled mammography stands in the bottom 9.4% nationally, fine-particle is in the top 11.7% nationally, and extreme heat rests in the top 11.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 14.9% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 20% nationally.

In plain language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 67002, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Wichita, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.9–31.7
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.9–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Depression among adults21.5%18.6–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.0–42.2
Obesity among adults39.5%34.3–44.8
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.5–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.0–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.0–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.7–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.2–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%59.3–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.6–69.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.7%61.5–75.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.4–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.4–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.0%19.6–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%31.9–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.0–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.4–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–16.1
Any disability among adults31.0%27.3–34.9
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%17.2–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.0–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.3–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate81.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+13.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$73,589$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$173,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,125$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured