Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34293

in Venice, FloridaPopulation 50,278

56.99/ 100

Ranked #7,284 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #291 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #23 of 42 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

90.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

198.5 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.2%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

43.8%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30.9%

in the bottom 14.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 34293, one of several in Venice, Florida lands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,284th) and the top 30% of Florida (291st).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled colon screening rests in the top 2.7% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden is in the bottom 7.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas sits in the top 0.4% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 1.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled disaster risk rests in the top 5.3% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 34285, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 73.5; chronic-disease standing 21.5 — 52 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,337 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.3%33.9–40.8
High blood pressure among adults44.0%40.1–47.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults16.0%14.7–17.4
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Depression among adults17.9%15.3–20.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.8–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.3%43.3–51.3
Obesity among adults28.8%24.0–33.8
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.0–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.5–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.6%83.1–87.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%82.2–86.9
Cholesterol screening among adults92.6%91.7–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.2%71.3–78.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.7%64.6–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%69.8–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.8–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%19.2–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%26.6–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.6–20.1
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%11.2–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Any disability among adults31.0%27.4–34.6
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate88.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population8.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households72.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+44.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age62.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$90,038$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$411,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,907$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured