Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66090

in Wathena, KansasPopulation 2,380

48.70/ 100

Ranked #18,071 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #401 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #17 of 31 St. Joseph, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.38 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

60%

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Wathena, Kansas (ZIP 66090) lands in the bottom 44% nationally (18,071st) and the bottom 41% of Kansas (401st).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: elder services rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon is in the top 9.4% nationally, and mammography sits in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat lies in the top 16% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 14.4% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 66002, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Joseph, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.8–32.5
High blood pressure among adults36.6%32.5–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Depression among adults21.5%18.4–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.8–41.7
Obesity among adults38.4%30.3–47.3
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%12.9–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.6–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.7–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%73.8–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.1–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%54.6–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.9%57.2–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.5%60.8–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.7–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.7–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.1–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%28.8–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%16.0–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.8–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.1–16.7
Any disability among adults31.9%27.7–36.6
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%17.7–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.7–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.6–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Loneliness among adults30.4%25.4–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate79.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$87,025$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$161,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$806$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured