Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77047

in Houston, TexasPopulation 34,987

51.24/ 100

Ranked #14,494 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #448 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #92 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

14.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.6%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.2 days/year

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.5%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 77047, one of several in Houston, Texas, on the composite measure, lands in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,494th) and the top 24% of Texas (448th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally, coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and radon stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 1.4% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the top 3.6% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 7.3% nationally, and uninsured lies in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 77581, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 81.8 — 78 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,075 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.7%16.7–20.9
High blood pressure among adults34.9%31.9–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Depression among adults18.2%15.8–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.6–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.3%29.3–35.4
Obesity among adults40.1%35.6–44.8
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.3–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.0%14.8–19.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.5%71.8–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.1%73.1–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%54.6–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.7%50.7–56.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%70.9–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.4–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.8–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.7%21.6–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults44.6%40.9–48.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.8–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%13.1–16.5
Any disability among adults29.0%25.9–32.4
Hearing disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6423.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate72.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population17.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households30.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+8.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$78,538$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$234,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,775$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured