Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64079

in Platte City, MissouriPopulation 15,160

56.93/ 100

Ranked #7,350 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #66 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranked #59 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

9.3%

in the bottom 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.8%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

29 days/year

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.5%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.1%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.8%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.7%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

3.0%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Platte City, Missouri (ZIP 64079), on the composite measure, lands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,350th) and the top 6.7% of Missouri (66th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 11.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 14.8% nationally, and stroke is in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Mental-health providers rests in the top 15% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Against that, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 12.8% nationally, and extreme heat lands in the top 16% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 16% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 64153, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.2 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $99,161 predicts 80.0 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,427 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.3–29.4
High blood pressure among adults33.4%29.8–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.1
Depression among adults23.9%20.6–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.1–41.0
Obesity among adults37.2%31.0–43.8
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%8.5–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.6–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.2–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.2–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%60.2–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%63.2–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%69.0–84.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.4–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.1–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%19.2–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%27.6–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.9–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.9–16.6
Any disability among adults29.8%26.1–33.7
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.5%14.9–20.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.8–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.8–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate69.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households47.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age40.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$99,161$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$350,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,407$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured