Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35564

in Hackleburg, AlabamaPopulation 2,356

38.83/ 100

Ranked #27,526 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranked #435 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.3%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.0%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

55.5 mi

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Hackleburg, Alabama (ZIP 35564) lands in the bottom 14.2% nationally (27,526th) and the bottom 30% of Alabama (435th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 6.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the top 9.4% nationally, and obesity settles in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lies in the top 10.8% nationally. On the stronger side, pharmacy resides in the top 0.4% nationally, elder services lands in the top 2.6% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 10.1% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, pharmacy runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 35570, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.1; chronic-disease standing 12.5 — 77 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #672 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%31.6–38.8
High blood pressure among adults45.7%41.3–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Depression among adults27.0%23.2–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.6–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.2%39.7–48.9
Obesity among adults43.6%35.1–52.5
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.3–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%9.2–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.4–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.3–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%81.8–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%58.5–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.7%48.7–56.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.1–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.7–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%17.4–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%28.2–38.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%31.7–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%23.9–31.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.2–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.0–21.9
Any disability among adults42.6%37.7–47.8
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.2–23.6
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.8–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%16.9–24.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.7–18.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.3–15.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
Loneliness among adults35.0%29.9–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.1–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6424.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)16.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription74.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age33.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$44,096$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$98,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$525$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured