Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65580

in Vichy, MissouriPopulation 686

42.11/ 100

Ranked #25,120 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #588 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

19.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

65.9%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

41.1%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.1%

in the top 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Vichy, Missouri (ZIP 65580), overall, ranks in the bottom 22% nationally (25,120th) and the bottom 41% of Missouri (588th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: civic rests in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas settles in the bottom 8.4% nationally. On the other side, unemployment is in the top 2.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the top 10.1% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 12.2% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 12.3% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 13.7% nationally.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 65401, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.8%31.7–39.8
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.4–46.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.3–12.7
Depression among adults25.1%21.1–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.4–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%36.9–46.6
Obesity among adults38.6%29.9–47.9
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%13.6–20.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%6.7–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.1–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%76.9–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.4–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.0–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%53.7–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%62.1–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.6–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%15.5–22.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%27.8–39.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%33.8–49.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%20.4–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.3–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%14.8–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.3%15.7–21.0
Any disability among adults41.2%35.8–46.7
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.0–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.2%17.2–23.3
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.4–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%10.8–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.5–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.1–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.8–9.3
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.6–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)13.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)19.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription65.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate73.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+26.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$69,898$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$258,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.6 yr ± 2.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.36 years of 83.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured