Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36553

in Mc Intosh, AlabamaPopulation 3,422

38.50/ 100

Ranked #27,717 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.6%)

Ranked #451 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.83%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

47%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

151.7 days/year

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

32.3%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.9%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.3%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Mc Intosh, Alabama (ZIP 36553) lands in the bottom 13.6% nationally (27,717th) and the bottom 27% of Alabama (451st).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled short sleep lands in the top 1.4% nationally, humid heat lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Poverty rests in the top 5.6% nationally, distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 6.1% nationally. Unemployment settles in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the top 7.9% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and mental-health providers lands in the top 1.5% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 36513, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 77.1; chronic-disease standing 12.8 — 64 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,436 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.4–37.7
High blood pressure among adults47.9%43.4–52.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.3–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%16.8–21.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.7–45.8
Obesity among adults44.3%35.9–52.9
Stroke among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.0%17.2–25.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.5–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.8–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.6–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.4–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%60.0–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.1%45.9–54.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.0–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.1–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.9–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%28.3–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults47.0%39.4–55.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.9%25.7–32.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.3–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.6–21.0
Any disability among adults43.4%38.4–48.5
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.9–13.5
Mobility disability among adults21.9%19.3–24.5
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.5%25.4–33.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.9%24.3–31.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%16.9–22.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.6%17.0–22.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.4–15.9
Loneliness among adults38.1%32.7–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.9–15.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6415.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)14.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)11.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle11.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription73.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households51.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$51,897$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$185,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$488$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 2.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.17 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured