Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64835

in Carterville, MissouriPopulation 2,074

42.68/ 100

Ranked #24,665 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #557 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #19 of 31 Joplin, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.3 mi

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Carterville, Missouri (ZIP 64835) ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,665th) and the bottom 44% of Missouri (557th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: recreation lies in the top 7.6% nationally, and civic lands in the top 11.4% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 14.5% nationally, and walkability settles in the top 15% nationally. On the other side, modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 9.8% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 11.9% nationally, modeled fine-particle stands in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled extreme heat lies in the top 20% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Close by, ZIP 64870, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Joplin, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.9–33.8
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.7–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.1–11.7
Depression among adults26.6%22.8–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.0–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.3–42.0
Obesity among adults40.2%32.5–48.1
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%15.7–22.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%7.8–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.2–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.4–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%79.6–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%57.4–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.5–61.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%65.7–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.0–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%15.5–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%26.6–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%32.7–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.6%19.5–27.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.0–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%13.6–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%16.9–23.2
Any disability among adults39.4%33.7–45.2
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.5
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.0–12.7
Mobility disability among adults17.4%14.5–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.8–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%16.7–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.9%12.4–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%10.5–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.6–16.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.6
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.3–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6419.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate74.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households42.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age32.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$58,849$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$97,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$796$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured