Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

64780

in Rockville, MissouriPopulation 364

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

35.94/ 100

Ranked #29,021 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranked #836 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

12.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.8%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.2%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.4 mi

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Rockville, Missouri (ZIP 64780) sits in the bottom 9.5% nationally (29,021st) and the bottom 16% of Missouri (836th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled hearing disability settles in the top 2.8% nationally, mobility disability stands in the top 6.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 8.5% nationally, stroke sits in the top 8.9% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 9.8% nationally. More positively, modeled transportation noise lands at the national minimum, and pfas resides in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 9.5% nationally.

In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 64724, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%34.2–39.9
High blood pressure among adults45.4%42.2–48.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.9%10.0–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.9–11.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.3%11.8–14.9
Depression among adults25.5%22.7–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%15.0–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%40.3–46.9
Obesity among adults40.0%34.2–46.2
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.0%18.3–24.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.2–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%79.3–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.1–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.4–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.0%59.9–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%50.6–56.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%63.1–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.8–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.9%19.3–24.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.7%32.4–40.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.1–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.1%25.1–31.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.5–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%17.2–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.2–22.4
Any disability among adults45.1%41.2–49.1
Hearing disability among adults12.6%11.4–13.7
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Mobility disability among adults23.4%20.9–26.0
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.6–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.4–19.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.5–17.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.5–10.8
Loneliness among adults30.8%27.3–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)8.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription78.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate80.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households81.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+36.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age61.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$44,107$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$108,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$809$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured