Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64725

in Archie, MissouriPopulation 2,130

50.04/ 100

Ranked #16,189 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranked #189 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #104 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.43 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.85 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

27.4 days/year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

10.3%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Archie, Missouri (ZIP 64725) ranks in the bottom 50% nationally (16,189th) and the top 19% of Missouri (189th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: grocery resides in the top 2.1% nationally, and childcare registers in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and poverty stands in the bottom 13.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 13.4% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, floodplain exposure is in the top 13.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat resides in the top 17% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 64078, about 3.5 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.9–31.6
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.5–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Depression among adults25.1%22.0–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.7–41.1
Obesity among adults37.7%32.1–43.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.7–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.6–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.2–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%74.2–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.4–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%59.0–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.8–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%70.5–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.9–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.8–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%23.1–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%33.1–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.4–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.9–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.2–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Any disability among adults33.6%29.7–37.5
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.3
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.4–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%17.0–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.8–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age35.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$84,722$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$232,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,185$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured