Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66223

in Overland Park, KansasPopulation 24,747

69.92/ 100

Ranked #606 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.9%)

Ranked #7 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 1.1%)

Ranked #7 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 3.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

10.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.1%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

4.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 66223, one of several in Overland Park, Kansas, overall, ranks in the top 1.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (606th) and the top 1.1% of Kansas (7th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled transportation resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, food insecurity settles in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 4.9% nationally, stroke lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 66209, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.8 ± 2.3 years. A median household income of $114,855 predicts 80.6 years — 4.2 years above.

    Ranked #161 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.8 ± 2.3 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.6 years — 5.2 years above them.

    Ranked #107 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 23.0; chronic-disease standing 94.8 (top 10%) — 72 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,558 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.3%18.6–22.1
High blood pressure among adults29.5%27.2–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.0–8.3
Current asthma among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Depression among adults17.1%15.3–19.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%34.1–39.1
Obesity among adults27.9%25.0–30.9
Stroke among adults2.1%2.0–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.4%3.5–5.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.5–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.5–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.8–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.7–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%63.6–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.2%72.9–77.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%74.2–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.7–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%27.1–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Frequent physical distress among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Any disability among adults21.7%19.5–24.0
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Independent living disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.3
Mobility disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.8–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults2.8%2.4–3.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Loneliness among adults28.0%25.3–30.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)67.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate55.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population20.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$114,855$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$437,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,718$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.8 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 84.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured