ZIP code
64676
in Rothville, MissouriPopulation 132
45.12/ 100
Ranked #22,279 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)
Ranked #424 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 43%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a Superfund site
72.3 mi
in the top 6.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
28.2%
in the bottom 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.1%
in the top 10.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 13.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS13thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
20 per million
in the bottom 25% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS25thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Rothville, Missouri (ZIP 64676) stands in the bottom 31% nationally (22,279th) and the top 43% of Missouri (424th).
A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 6.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 8.4% nationally, disaster risk rests in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. By contrast, fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 10.0% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 12.3% nationally.
For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 64631, about 5.6 miles away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 46%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 48%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 42%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 20%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 25%
11%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 22%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 51%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Disability
healthier than 51%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 28%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 38%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
64628
Missourishares a border
Score 43.73
Closest healthier
64631
Missouriabout 5.6 mi away
Score 47.18
Similar health profile
42031
Kentucky97% similar profile
Score 42.73
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.1% | 31.0–39.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.5% | 36.8–46.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.6% | 9.6–11.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.6% | 9.3–12.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.8% | 7.7–10.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.4% | 8.7–12.2 |
| Depression among adults | 24.0% | 20.4–27.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.2% | 12.1–16.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.8% | 37.1–46.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.4% | 31.2–48.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.8–4.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.6% | 16.9–24.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.0% | 6.0–10.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.1% | 78.0–83.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.5% | 77.0–83.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.2% | 85.1–89.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.3% | 54.3–64.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.2% | 56.3–64.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.1% | 65.7–81.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.3% | 11.7–17.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.2% | 15.4–22.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.2% | 25.5–36.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.0% | 31.2–45.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 22.5% | 18.8–26.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.8–19.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.5% | 14.2–18.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.2% | 14.7–19.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.4% | 33.0–43.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.2–11.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.1–11.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.6% | 15.6–21.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.8–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.6–6.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.6% | 15.3–22.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.5% | 9.6–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.2% | 7.8–13.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.3% | 8.2–12.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.4% | 6.1–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.2% | 23.3–33.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 6.4–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 14.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 13.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 77.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 14.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 56.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 26.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 44.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $59,519 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $84,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.5 yr ± 2.92 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.92 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured