Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64656

in Ludlow, MissouriPopulation 237

48.26/ 100

Ranked #18,592 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #264 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.0%

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.2%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

1.8%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ludlow, Missouri (ZIP 64656) ranks in the bottom 42% nationally (18,592nd) and the top 27% of Missouri (264th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: fiber broadband resides at the national maximum, and modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 13.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 14.8% nationally. Working the other way, home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 8.9% nationally, unemployment stands in the top 12.1% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 13.1% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 13.3% nationally, households without a vehicle stands in the top 14.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 16% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 18% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 64638, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%27.9–35.0
High blood pressure among adults37.5%33.2–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Depression among adults25.2%21.5–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%9.9–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%34.0–42.9
Obesity among adults37.5%29.5–45.6
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.2%13.2–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.0–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.2–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.2–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%82.7–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%59.1–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.3–65.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%67.4–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.6–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%13.8–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.1%24.1–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.6–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%17.1–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.0–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.1–19.7
Any disability among adults37.8%32.8–42.8
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.4–19.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.0–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.8–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.0–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)16.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle10.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription74.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population4.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households31.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$58,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$107,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$639$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.4 yr ± 2.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.40 years of 84.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured