Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64492

in Trimble, MissouriPopulation 1,713

50.49/ 100

Ranked #15,578 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #180 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #99 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

36.7%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

10.2%

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US26th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

69.3%

in the top 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Trimble, Missouri (ZIP 64492), on the composite measure, lands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,578th) and the top 18% of Missouri (180th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: modeled loneliness is in the bottom 9.6% nationally, civic rests in the top 10.9% nationally, and park land sits in the top 13.1% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled radon lands in the top 13.4% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 12.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the top 14.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat is in the top 18% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 64048, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.4–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.0–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.5–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Depression among adults24.1%21.0–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%37.1–44.7
Obesity among adults38.9%32.4–45.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.4–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.0–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.1–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.6–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.5–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%64.8–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.0–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%67.7–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.9–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.6–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.5–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%28.4–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.4–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.3–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.0–17.5
Any disability among adults36.6%32.5–40.5
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.5–18.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.4%15.8–21.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.5–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6412.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate86.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households63.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age48.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$66,211$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$225,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$956$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured