Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55303

in Ramsey, MinnesotaPopulation 52,614

57.75/ 100

Ranked #6,612 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #191 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #139 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

394 units

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.6%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.3%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.9 mi

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Ramsey, Minnesota (ZIP 55303) sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,612th) and the top 22% of Minnesota (191st).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: subsidized affordable housing is in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Childcare is in the top 11.3% nationally. Against that, modeled disaster risk lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and fine-particle registers in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 8.7% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 8.7% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 10.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 10.6% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 55011, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.7; chronic-disease standing 85.4 — 66 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,995 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.4–23.4
High blood pressure among adults30.2%27.6–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Depression among adults25.8%23.1–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.6%29.0–34.3
Obesity among adults36.2%32.5–40.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.7–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%6.1–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.6–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%69.6–75.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.2–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%66.1–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%65.4–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%71.4–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.4–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.8–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.3%27.2–33.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.7–17.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.8
Any disability among adults27.6%24.9–30.4
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%21.1–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Loneliness among adults31.1%27.9–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate75.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$102,986$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$353,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,434$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured