Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64014

in Blue Springs, MissouriPopulation 28,788

52.76/ 100

Ranked #12,432 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #120 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 12.1%)

Ranked #86 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.5%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.8%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

3.0%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

2.4%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

32%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

5.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.8%

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US26th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

10.4%

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 64014, one of several in Blue Springs, Missouri places in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,432nd) and the top 12.1% of Missouri (120th).

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 14.6% nationally, walkability lands in the top 17% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the bottom 14.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 8.2% nationally, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 11.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 18% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 64015, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.5–28.1
High blood pressure among adults32.0%29.4–34.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Depression among adults26.8%24.0–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%35.2–41.2
Obesity among adults34.3%30.6–38.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.6–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.9–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.7%70.9–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%73.4–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.2–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%61.4–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.3%63.4–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%70.6–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.5–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%23.8–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%29.2–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%16.1–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.9–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Any disability among adults33.2%30.2–36.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.6%12.1–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.6–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Loneliness among adults32.1%28.8–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate67.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$90,337$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$251,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,402$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured