Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63469

in Shelbyville, MissouriPopulation 911

38.20/ 100

Ranked #27,896 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.1%)

Ranked #759 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.3%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

12.2 mi

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Shelbyville, Missouri (ZIP 63469), overall, ranks in the bottom 13.1% nationally (27,896th) and the bottom 24% of Missouri (759th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 10.6% nationally, and modeled pfas rests in the bottom 10.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled hearing disability resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss is in the top 8.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 10.0% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 10.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands in the top 11.3% nationally.

Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 63437, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.5%31.8–39.2
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.1–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.7%11.0–14.4
Depression among adults25.5%21.8–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.5–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.4–46.3
Obesity among adults40.3%32.1–49.0
Stroke among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.1%19.9–28.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.6–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.7–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.1–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.8–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%59.2–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.4%50.4–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%62.7–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.7–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.9%17.8–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.6%30.0–41.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%29.7–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.3–30.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.4–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.0–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%18.1–23.1
Any disability among adults44.6%39.4–49.6
Hearing disability among adults12.2%10.8–13.6
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.6–13.7
Mobility disability among adults21.9%19.0–24.8
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.5–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%13.9–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–17.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.6–14.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.1–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription85.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate80.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households55.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+24.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age47.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$55,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$120,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.3978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.39 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured