Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63363

in New Florence, MissouriPopulation 949

40.51/ 100

Ranked #26,395 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #671 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

12.0%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.7%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.4%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

New Florence, Missouri (ZIP 63363), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 18% nationally (26,395th) and the bottom 32% of Missouri (671st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 4.5% nationally, and slow internet speeds registers in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 9.7% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 11.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 13.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 63333, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.9%33.1–40.3
High blood pressure among adults43.7%39.3–47.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.1–12.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Depression among adults24.3%20.8–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.3–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%38.2–46.9
Obesity among adults37.3%29.4–45.1
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.8%15.7–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.6–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.8–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.7–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%58.6–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.1%53.4–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%65.9–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.4%16.7–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%29.5–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%31.0–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.2–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.5–19.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.5–20.8
Any disability among adults42.5%37.5–47.1
Hearing disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.2
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Mobility disability among adults21.4%18.8–23.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.7–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.1–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.1–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.3–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription76.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households66.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age47.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$47,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$97,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$855$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured