Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63090

in Washington, MissouriPopulation 23,258

50.91/ 100

Ranked #14,981 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #160 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #114 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.1%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.3%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

33%

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Washington, Missouri (ZIP 63090), on the composite measure, lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,981st) and the top 16% of Missouri (160th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: dental providers settles in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Elder services sits in the top 11.6% nationally, and physicians registers in the top 12.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Outpatient resides in the top 14.4% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 8.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 63013, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $85,025 predicts 79.4 years — 1.3 years below.

    Ranked #1,617 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%28.0–34.8
High blood pressure among adults36.9%33.0–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Depression among adults25.2%21.7–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.4–43.8
Obesity among adults38.3%31.6–45.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.3–13.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.9–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.5–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.5–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.5–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%62.9–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.2–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.1–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.3–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.2–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%27.1–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.5–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
Any disability among adults35.1%30.9–39.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.7%14.9–20.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.4–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Loneliness among adults28.1%23.7–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate76.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households54.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$85,025$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$273,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$881$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.51 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured