Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63353

in Louisiana, MissouriPopulation 4,790

38.85/ 100

Ranked #27,509 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)

Ranked #736 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.68 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

7.9%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Louisiana, Missouri (ZIP 63353), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 14.3% nationally (27,509th) and the bottom 26% of Missouri (736th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Pharmacy resides in the top 6.2% nationally, outpatient lies in the top 9.4% nationally, and childcare settles in the top 12.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled hearing disability is in the top 8.7% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 12.5% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 13.2% nationally. Poverty lands in the top 14.2% nationally.

A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 63334, just across the boundary. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 9.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.1–38.5
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.1–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.0–13.1
Depression among adults24.8%21.1–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.4–45.6
Obesity among adults38.4%30.5–46.8
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.5%15.9–23.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.8–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.6–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.3–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.7–85.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%56.9–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.2%50.2–58.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%66.3–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.2%17.2–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.2%29.8–40.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%31.9–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.0%22.5–29.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.3–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.4–22.5
Any disability among adults42.5%37.4–47.7
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.3
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Mobility disability among adults21.2%18.4–24.1
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.2–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.1–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.3–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.8–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6424.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription85.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate69.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households60.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$46,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$95,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$684$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured