Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62888

in Tamaroa, IllinoisPopulation 1,843

45.92/ 100

Ranked #21,434 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #1,087 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

32.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Tamaroa, Illinois (ZIP 62888) places in the bottom 33% nationally (21,434th) and the bottom 21% of Illinois (1,087th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: recreation rests in the top 3.3% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 10.1% nationally. Civic is in the top 12.2% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes registers in the top 11.2% nationally, modeled mammography settles in the bottom 13.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits in the top 15% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 62831, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%29.2–33.8
High blood pressure among adults38.7%36.2–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.4–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.6–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Depression among adults23.1%20.9–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.9–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%36.4–41.8
Obesity among adults39.3%34.8–44.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%11.8–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.9–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%76.4–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%76.4–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.2–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.8%57.2–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.1–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%60.6–78.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.8–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%15.0–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%23.0–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%30.3–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%19.5–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.4–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%14.1–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.5–16.4
Any disability among adults33.7%30.8–37.0
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.7%15.0–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%22.4–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.4–16.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Loneliness among adults33.5%30.4–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households68.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age48.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$66,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$112,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$835$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured